Journal of Meditation based Psychological Counseling (J Medit Psychol Couns)
Indexed in KCI
OPEN ACCESS, PEER REVIEWED
pISSN 2289-0823
eISSN 2671-6119
Research Article

A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Buddhist meditation intervention programs

Professor, WISE, Dongguk University, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to Jeong, Gwiyeon, E-mail: karma2008@dongguk.ac.kr

Volume 36, Pages 15-29, April 2026.
Journal of Meditation Based Psychological Counseling 2026, 36, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.12972/mpca.2026.36.2
Received on March 14, 2026, Revised on April 27, 2026, Accepted on April 28, 2026, Published on April 30, 2026.
Copyright © 2026 Meditation based Psychological Counseling Association.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).

Abstract

This study conducted a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of Buddhist meditation intervention programs on psychological health outcomes. A total of 138 studies published between 2024 and 2025, listed in KCI-indexed or KCI-candidate journals, involving 6,366 participants were analyzed. Effect sizes were computed using Hedges’ g under a random-effects model to account for high heterogeneity among studies. The overall effect size was g = .250 (95% CI: .040–.460, p < .05), indicating a small-to-medium positive effect. Heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 93.0%, Q = 1949.88, p .05).
Subgroup analyses by intervention type revealed that MBSR/MBCT programs yielded the highest effect size (g = .766, p < .001), followed by other mindfulness-based programs (g = .716, p .05). Compassion meditation (g = .115) and counseling-therapy meditation (g = .013) did not reach statistical significance. Regarding participant age groups, the effect was most pronounced among children (g = 3.364, p < .001) and adults (g = 1.360, p < .05), while adolescents and young adults showed non-significant positive trends. Analysis by program duration indicated that long-term programs exceeding 12 sessions demonstrated the largest and only statistically significant effect (g = .776, p < .05), suggesting that sustained practice is essential for meaningful psychological change.
Outcome-specific analyses showed that Buddhist meditation programs were highly effective in enhancing positive psychological factors, including self-compassion (g = 1.641, p < .05), mindfulness (g = 1.132, p < .001), life satisfaction (g = .899, p < .001), and problem-solving competency (g = 1.100, p < .001). Significant reductions were also observed in negative psychological indicators such as depression (g = –.910, p < .01), perceived stress (g = –.774, p < .01), anxiety (g = –.727, p < .01), and emotion dysregulation (g = –.582, p < .05). These findings demonstrate that Buddhist meditation programs possess multidimensional therapeutic effects encompassing the cultivation of positive psychological assets, the alleviation of psychological distress, and the enhancement of practical life competencies. The results provide empirical evidence supporting Buddhist meditation as a viable complementary intervention for mental health promotion in the post-COVID era and offer practical implications for designing tailored programs in clinical and educational settings.
Keywords

Buddhist meditation, Meta-analysis, Effect size, Mindfulness, Psychological health

Section